Anyone Know Anything About Slurm On CentOS 7?
The recently-left programmer did *something*, and he didn’t know what, and the guy who picked it up is working with me to find out why
/var/log/messages is getting flooded with Oct 26 11:01:06
audit(1477494066.569:642430): pid8551 uid=0 auidB94967295
sesB94967295 subj=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0
msg=’op=PAM:session_open grantors=pam_keyinit,pam_keyinit,pam_limits,pam_systemd,pam_unix,pam_krb5,pam_xauth acct=”
Oct 26 11:01:06
audit(1477494066.620:642431): pid8548 uid=0 auidB94967295
sesB94967295 subj=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0
msg=’op=PAM:session_close grantors=pam_keyinit,pam_keyinit,pam_limits,pam_systemd,pam_unix,pam_krb5,pam_xauth acct=”
Oct 26 11:01:06
audit(1477494066.620:642432): pid8548 uid=0 auidB94967295
sesB94967295 subj=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0
msg=’op=PAM:setcred grantors=pam_rootok acct=”
hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success’
Oct 26 11:01:11
Other folks can submit jobs to slurm, and we don’t get anything like this.
Feel free to contact me offlist….
mark Oct 26 11:01:11
4 thoughts on - Anyone Know Anything About Slurm On CentOS 7?
looks like auditd logging is a bit tweaked.
eero
26.10.2016 6.11 ip. kirjoitti:
You might have some luck on the beowulf mailing list – http://beowulf.org/
There are quite a few slurmy types kicking around there.
Eero Volotinen wrote:
As far as I know, it’s selinux-policy-targeted out of the box. (And yes, we do have it in permissive mode.)
Any thoughts on how to tweak that?
mark
m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[…]
Is your auditd service running? I believe I’ve seen cases where auditd was not running, leading to audit-stuff showing up in /var/log/messages