It’s unclear what you mean. I saw a new message on the ML and responded to it. Where did this ‘threading breaking’ take place?
Patrick
One thought on - Freeradius, openLDAP And TLS
===>
my email to you had nothing to do with original thread;
Subject: [CentOS] mount bind problems
email to you “off list” was because i did not wish to add to breaking raveling of thread.
doing so now is only because of your request and desire for further raveling of original thread.
===>
the threading breaking took place when Andrew Daviel got too lazy to compose a new email.
what he obviously did was select “reply” to a post by Robert Nichols. then in compose window, changed “Subject:” to ‘Freeradius, openLDAP, and TLS”. then he removed _all_ of text that was in ‘body’ and type in his problem.
what he is obviously unaware of, as are you, that still in email headers where _all_ references to original thread.
also, what he is obviously unaware of is that time he spent is much longer than it would have been had he simply started with a fresh, blank email composure.
my apologies to rest of readers that i have further broken original thread.
i extend no apologies to Andrew Dumbviel or to Patrick Lameblock. B-)
One thought on - Freeradius, openLDAP And TLS
===>
my email to you had nothing to do with original thread;
Subject: [CentOS] mount bind problems
email to you “off list” was because i did not wish to add to breaking raveling of thread.
doing so now is only because of your request and desire for further raveling of original thread.
===>
the threading breaking took place when Andrew Daviel got too lazy to compose a new email.
what he obviously did was select “reply” to a post by Robert Nichols. then in compose window, changed “Subject:” to ‘Freeradius, openLDAP, and TLS”. then he removed _all_ of text that was in ‘body’ and type in his problem.
what he is obviously unaware of, as are you, that still in email headers where _all_ references to original thread.
also, what he is obviously unaware of is that time he spent is much longer than it would have been had he simply started with a fresh, blank email composure.
my apologies to rest of readers that i have further broken original thread.
i extend no apologies to Andrew Dumbviel or to Patrick Lameblock. B-)