Libdrm Info Wrong When Build With Mock – Test Solution??
Hello guys…
I compiled inside of “mock”
libdrm 2.67
mesa 11.2.1
ati 7.6.1
mockbuild says:
libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.CentOS local-drivers – OK
mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.CentOS local-mesa – OK
installed packaged:
xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.CentOS
@local-drivers OK
libdrm.x86_64
2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.CentOS OK
glxinfo says:
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM
3.6.2)
OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
3.00
DRM 2.43.0 ??
Wired…
4 thoughts on - Libdrm Info Wrong When Build With Mock – Test Solution??
forgotten to say,
on my first CentOS installation i dig it up as yum-builddep and rpmbuild and it did work:
libdrm mesa ati
Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Andreas Benzler:
after downgrade all mesa libdrm ati:
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER
OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 10.6.5
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 10.6.5
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 10.6.5
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
3.00
libdrm info gone…? Output mistake? harmless?
Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 19:08 +0200 schrieb Andreas Benzler:
These are not versions in CentOS (not supported). What is the source of these SRPMs?
Regards
Phil
Hello Phil,
the idea behind of all my private work to get CentOS 7 work for more as an server only system:
http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/ <http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/>
and it looks like a harmless output that can be ignored.
http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/drivers/ <http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/drivers/>
X11 and ATI (stable)
http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/mesa/ <http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/mesa/>
Mesa (11.1.2 stable)
kernel http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/kernel/x86_64/ <http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/kernel/x86_64/>
4.4.7 lts stable
the graphical desktop runs much better.
No one of my Desktop PC around works good with the default resources. Don’t forget that CentOS 7 is from 2014 and two of my machines are from 2010 and 2012.
nux-dextop gstreamer never works for me on CentOS 7.2
http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/gstreamer/x86_64/ <http://CentOS.cms4all.org/CentOS/7/gstreamer/x86_64/>
this setup run everything that i touch in multimedia with totem.
Sources and rpm not gpg – private server. Baken with CentOS and epel mock
Sincerely
Andy